White, J.
Control of disclosure is within the sphere of the trial court's broad discretionary power and, absent abuse, should not be disturbed (see, Dunlap v. United Health Servs., 189 A.D.2d 1072; Soper v. Wilkinson Match [USA], 176 A.D.2d 1025). Applying this principle here, we affirm since we agree with Supreme Court that defendant did not establish the necessity for a second physical examination and, more particularly, a psychiatric examination of plaintiff Shirleen A. Ricci.
Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.