Upon review of the record, we find that the evidence supports the jury's finding that defendant terminated plaintiff's employment because of plaintiff's sabbath observance in violation of Executive Law § 296 (10) (see, Matter of Schweizer Aircraft Corp. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 48 N.Y.2d 294), and that the award of $12,500 for mental anguish does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation (compare, Kelley v Analytab Prods., 204 A.D.2d 113). Nor did the after-acquired evidence of plaintiff's resume fraud entitle defendant to judgment as a matter of law (see, Moodie v. Federal Reserve Bank, 831 F. Supp. 333, 336).
We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Ross, J.P., Asch, Rubin, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.