Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MARY ELIZABETH RENDE, RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. RICHARD JOSEPH RENDE, APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal and a cross-appeal from an order of the trial court modifying maintenance. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find the circuit court's judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RENDE v. RENDE
(Dec 8, 1994)