AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of JOHN E. CARMAN, Petitioner, v. H. CARL McCALL, as Comptroller of the State of New York, and Administrati

Casey, J.

By separate determinations, respondent denied petitioner's applications for accidental and ordinary disability retirement benefits. In each determination, respondent concluded that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of his employment as a sanitation man. Respondent's expert testified that although petitioner suffered from a condition known as chondromalacia of the joint in the right knee, which might cause some pain after a day's work, the condition did not permanently incapacitate petitioner from the performance of his duties. The testimony of respondent's expert provides substantial evidence to support respondent's determinations and, therefore, they must be confirmed (see, Matter of Ramseur v Regan, 154 A.D.2d 869).

Mikoll, J.P., Crew III and Peters, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CARMAN v. McCALL
(Dec 8, 1994)