Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JAMES COOPER, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. W.B. "BILLY" NOBLE, SHERIFF OF MADISON COUNTY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, JESSIE HOPKINS, SHERIFF OF MADISON COUNTY, ROBERT J. DOWDLE, MARCUS SHARPE, DAVID H. RICHARDSON, KARL M. BANKS J.L. McCULLOUGH, MEMBERS OF THE MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

We supplement our prior opinion, see Cooper v. Noble, 33 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 1994), as follows:

The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 ("the Act"), P.L. 103-322, 108 Stat. 1796, effective September 13, 1994, provides for periodic reopening "at the behest of a defendant" of court orders or consent decrees seeking to remedy prison or jail crowding that violates the Eighth Amendment. Id. § 20409(a) (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3626(c)). The Act applies to all outstanding court orders on the date of its enactment. Id. § 20409(b).

No issue pertaining to the Act was brought before us; the defendants did not, pursuant to the Act, request a reopening; and, finally, the District Court proceedings reviewed in this appeal were conducted prior to September 13, 1994. Accordingly, the provisions of the Act are not applicable to our determination of the instant appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COOPER v. NOBLE
(Dec 15, 1994)