AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN THE INTEREST OF C.M.C., RESPONDENT, v. ______, APPELLANT.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals from the decision of the Juvenile Court of St. Louis County adopting the Juvenile Court Commissioner's order finding that a four-year-old juvenile came within the provisions of § 211.031 (1), RSMo Supp. 1993, and awarding custody of the juvenile to father. We affirm. The judgment of the Juvenile Court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence; no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16 (b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN INTEREST OF C.M.C
(Jan 3, 1995)