AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LARRY KIRSCHNER et al., Respondents, v. MICHAEL J. CUSA et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Orange County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, all the papers filed in the action and certified copies of all minutes and entries (see, CPLR 511 [d]).

The plaintiffs, residents of Ulster County, improperly designated venue of this action in Orange County, where none of the parties reside, thereby forfeiting their right to designate venue (see, CPLR 503 [a]; Kaplan v. Waldbaum's Inc., 208 A.D.2d 683; Nixon v. Federated Dept. Stores, 170 A.D.2d 659). With their answer the defendants served a demand to change venue and timely moved to change venue to Ulster County, where they also reside. Consequently, the Supreme Court should have granted the motion (see, CPLR 510; 511; Kaplan v. Waldbaum's Inc., supra; Nixon v. Federated Dept. Stores, supra, at 660). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KIRSCHNER v. CUSA
(Jan 17, 1995)