Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Undra SUMLIN v. STATE of Arkansas

ATTORNEY CLIENT — INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL — WHEN SUCH A POINT MAY BE RAISED. — Ineffective assistance of counsel may not be raised as a point of direct appeal unless the issue has been considered by the Trial Court, e.g., on a motion for new trial.

DAVID NEWBERN, Justice.

Undra Sumlin was convicted of two counts of delivery of cocaine and one count of conspiracy to deliver cocaine. He was sentenced as an habitual offender to 66 years imprisonment. His points of appeal relate only to his contention that his trial counsel was ineffective.

Ineffective assistance of counsel may not be raised as a point of direct appeal, Harrison v. State, 303 Ark. 247, 796 S.W.2d 329 (1990), unless the issue has been considered by the Trial Court, e.g., on a motion for new trial. Missildine v. State, 314 Ark. 500, 863 S.W.2d 813 (1993). See also Knappenberger v. State, 278 Ark. 382, 647 S.W.2d 417 (1983); Hilliard v. State, 259 Ark. 81, 531 S.W.2d 463 (1976).

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SUMLIN v. STATE
(Jan 23, 1995)