Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Compensation of Warren N. Bowen, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Uni v. rsity of Oregon, Petitioners on Re

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of Martin v. City of Albany, 320 Or. 175, 880 P.2d 926 (1994), and Niccum v. South Coast Lumber Co., 320 Or. 189, 880 P.2d 923 (1994).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAIF CORPORATION v. BOWEN
(Jan 27, 1995)