Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the application for a permanent stay of arbitration is granted.
It is well settled that with regard to the billing for payment of premiums upon assigned risk policies, the rules of the New York Automobile Insurance Plan must be strictly complied with in order for the subsequent cancellation for nonpayment of the premium to be effective (see, Eveready Ins. Co. v. Mitchell, 133 A.D.2d 210, 211; Matter of Home Indem. Co. v. Scricca, 147 A.D.2d 697, 698; Allstate Ins. Co. v. Ramirez, 208 A.D.2d 828). In this case, Progressive Insurance Company (hereinafter Progressive) failed to comply with New York Automobile Insurance Plan § 14 (E) (2) (b) in that it did not bill the insured for the payment of the premium at least 15 days prior to the due date, and it failed to inform the insured that payment could be rendered "through his producer or directly to the company" (New York Automobile Insurance Plan § 14 [E] [2] [b]). Accordingly, Progressive's cancellation of the policy was ineffective, and the Supreme Court should have granted the petitioner's application to stay arbitration of the uninsured motorist claim. Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.