AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

EDWARD ISHAQ, Respondent, v. RAVI BATRA, Appellant, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Ordered that the judgment entered July 24, 1991, and the order entered September 12, 1991, are affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered December 12, 1991, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

A review of the record supports the trial court's conclusion that at the time the premises was sold pursuant to the judgment of foreclosure, its fair market value did not exceed the actual sale price of $332,824.42. Therefore, based upon the total amount of the foreclosure judgment entered in the plaintiff's favor, a deficiency judgment of $112,020.11 was properly awarded pursuant to RPAPL 1371 (2). The appellant's assertion that the foreclosure sale was infected by fraud is unsupported by the evidence presented.

We have examined the appellant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Hart, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ISHAQ v. BATRA
(Feb 6, 1995)