AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

VICTOR P. SCHULZE, SR., et al., Respondent, v. ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES, Appellant.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The record demonstrates that the plaintiff was hired by C.D.I. Corporation, Northeast, which is in the business of supplying professional help to various companies, to work at premises owned by the defendant and occupied by Brookhaven National Laboratories. The plaintiff worked at Brookhaven from the inception of his employment until the date of his accident, and the defendant exercised exclusive direction and control over his daily activities. Therefore, the Supreme Court erred, as a matter of law, in failing to find that the plaintiff was a "special employee" of the defendant, and in denying the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Workers' Compensation Law (see, Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 553; Hoskins v. MIA Assocs., 201 A.D.2d 459; Carreras v. Lawrence Aviation Indus., 201 A.D.2d 693; Cameli v Pace Univ., 131 A.D.2d 419). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHULZE v. ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES
(Feb 14, 1995)