AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALBERT SHAW, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The testimony at the hearing established that the Assistant District Attorney had compiled a list of questions in preparation of his witness's testimony. The questions do not constitute Rosario material (see, People v. Gallardo, 196 A.D.2d 551; People v. Roberts, 178 A.D.2d 622). Further, three extremely brief factual statements contained within the list of questions were the prosecutor's work product and not statements made by Zachary Green during his pretrial interview. Accordingly, there was no Rosario violation (see, People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, cert denied 368 U.S. 866).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SHAW
(Feb 21, 1995)