AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MICHELLE ORLANDO et al., Respondents, v. CORNING INCORPORATED et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the plaintiffs' complaint is dismissed.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in vacating the plaintiffs' default and reinstating the complaint. The motion to vacate was untimely and the plaintiffs failed to establish a reasonable excuse for their default and the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see, Putney v. Pearlman, 203 A.D.2d 333; Fennell v. Mason, 204 A.D.2d 599; Schiavetta v. McKeon, 190 A.D.2d 724). The unsubstantiated excuse proffered by the plaintiffs' attorney that she never received properly mailed motion papers and orders with a notice of entry was insufficient to rebut the proofs of service and the presumption of receipt (see, Jeraci v. Froehlich, 129 A.D.2d 557, 558-559). Additionally, the plaintiffs' complete failure to submit an affidavit of merit was fatal to their motion to vacate (see, Vierya v. Briggs Stratton Corp., 166 A.D.2d 645, 646). Mangano, P.J., O'Brien, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ORLANDO v. CORNING INCORPORATED
(Mar 13, 1995)