Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jay YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Justice DAY, Justice STEINMETZ, and Justice WILCOX would affirm; Chief Justice HEFFERNAN, Justice ABRAHAMSON, and Justice BABLITCH would reverse. Justice GESKE withdrew from participation.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

By the Court. — The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. YOUNG
(Mar 14, 1995)