DISTRIBUTEC v. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Neil Yoskin argued the cause for appellant ( Picco Mack Herbert, attorneys). Kathe F. Mullally, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, etc. ( Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel). Arnold C. Lakind argued the cause for Delanco Land Partnership ( Szaferman, Lakind, Blumstein, Watter Blader, attorneys). Nicholas J. Costa argued the cause for Township of Delanco ( Costa Vetra, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Neil Yoskin argued the cause for appellant ( Picco Mack Herbert, attorneys). Kathe F. Mullally, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, etc. ( Deborah T. Poritz, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mary C. Jacobson, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel). Arnold C. Lakind argued the cause for Delanco Land Partnership ( Szaferman, Lakind, Blumstein, Watter Blader, attorneys). Nicholas J. Costa argued the cause for Township of Delanco ( Costa Vetra, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

DISTRIBUTEC, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY, DIVISION OF COASTAL RESOURCES,RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, AND DELANCO LAND PARTNERSHIP AND THE TOWNSHIP OFDELANCO, INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 274 N.J. Super. 1, 643 A.2d 11 (1994).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

DISTRIBUTEC v. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

DISTRIBUTEC, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ENERGY, DIVISION OF COASTAL RESOURCES,RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT, AND DELANCO LAND PARTNERSHIP AND THE TOWNSHIP OFDELANCO, INTERVENORS-RESPONDENTS.

Comments