Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the father's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying his motion requesting copies of the probation and forensic reports since the court permitted counsel to review the reports in chambers (see, Kesseler v. Kesseler, 10 N.Y.2d 445, 455; Waldman v. Waldman, 95 A.D.2d 827; Matter of Fellows v. Fellows, 25 A.D.2d 865; Chrisaidos v. Chrisaidos, 170 A.D.2d 428, 429). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Lawrence, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.