Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant's contention that the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing was insufficient to require him to pay restitution in the amount of $1,500 is without merit. We find that the court's determination was fully supported by the victim's testimony at the dispositional hearing with respect to his losses as a result of the appellant's acts. Moreover, the court's determination with regard to the amount of restitution was not an improvident exercise of discretion (see, Matter of James A., 205 A.D.2d 621; Matter of Kerry E., 161 A.D.2d 843; cf., Matter of Richard GG., 187 A.D.2d 846; Matter of David N., 97 A.D.2d 980).
We find the appellant's remaining contention to be without merit. Mangano, P.J., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.