Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The respondent investigated the petitioner's complaint pursuant to the requirements set forth in Education Law § 6510 (1) (b). Its determination that no violations had occurred is a discretionary one for which review in a proceeding in the nature of mandamus is unavailable (see, Matter of Mullen v Axelrod, 74 N.Y.2d 580). Sullivan, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Krausman, JJ., concur.