Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EARL RUFFIN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in all respects except we reverse and remand on the issue of the imposed costs of prosecution. In order to recover the costs of prosecution pursuant to section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1993), the state must document its expenses, and the trial court must consider the defendant's financial resources. See Gant v. State, 640 So.2d 1180 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

We reverse the trial court's assessment of the costs of prosecution and remand to the trial court with directions to consider the state's actual costs and the defendant's ability to pay.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

GUNTHER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUFFIN v. STATE
(Apr 19, 1995)