AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Advocates
Judges

HERMES PRIDA, APPELLANT, v. COMMUNICATION CONTRACTORS AND EXECUTIVE RISK CONSULTANTS, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion appellant's Issues I, II and III, but reverse Issue IV and remand with directions to the judge of compensation claims to award wage-loss benefits, pursuant to our opinion in Mac Papers, Inc. v. Cruz, 658 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Although Prida filed numerous job-search forms, the carrier admitted that it had not informed Prida of his obligation to perform a work search, and there was no evidence showing who, if anyone, did inform him.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

ERVIN, BARFIELD, and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PRIDA v. COMMUNICATION CONTRACTORS
(May 1, 1995)