AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

66 DRIVE-IN, INC., PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. HYCEL PARTNERS III, L.P., HYCEL III, INC., AND SCHNUCK MARKETS, INC., DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff 66 Drive-In appeals the dismissal of its petition against the guarantors of a development agreement for interest on plaintiff's condemnation award after the developer abandoned the condemnation of plaintiff's land.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16 (b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

66 DRIVE-IN v. HYCEL PARTNERS III, L.P
(May 2, 1995)