AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CECIL BROWN, Appellant.

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

"Before a defense witness may be cross-examined regarding his or her failure to provide law enforcement authorities with exculpatory information attested to at trial, certain foundational requirements must be met" (People v Pittman, 187 A.D.2d 679; see, People v Dawson, 50 N.Y.2d 311, 321, n 4). The prosecutor in this case failed to comply with the foundational requirements set forth by the Court of Appeals in People v Dawson (supra) prior to cross-examining the defense witness. However, the error was harmless since there is no significant probability that the jury would have acquitted the defendant had the error not occurred (see, People v Ayala, 75 N.Y.2d 422, 431; People v Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 241-242).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit. Miller, J.P., Pizzuto, Joy and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BROWN
(May 8, 1995)