Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Gordon LEITCH, Jr., M.D., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF OREGON, Respondent.

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Taxpayer appeals from a judgment of the Oregon Tax Court that dismissed taxpayer's appeal of certain property taxes imposed for the 1992 tax year and imposed an award of attorney fees as a sanction for the filing of a "frivolous and groundless" appeal. On de novo review, ORS 305.445, we have considered each of taxpayer's legal contentions. We hold that none is well taken. An extended opinion to that effect would not benefit bench or bar.

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEITCH v. DEPT. OF REV
(May 11, 1995)