Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LEWIS TAYLOR, JR., APPELLANT, v. EVERETT I. PERRIN, JR., ET AL., APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Taylor appeals an order summarily denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which stated that "the petition on its face has failed to state any cause upon which relief may be granted." In our review, we must assume the allegations of the habeas petition are true. See Guess v. Barton, 599 So.2d 770 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). In this case the habeas petition alleges that administrative remedies have been exhausted and claims due process and double jeopardy violations in regard to Taylor's confinement to Close Management. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Roy v. Dugger, 592 So.2d 1235 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) and Guess v. Barton, supra.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, MINER and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TAYLOR v. PERRIN
(May 12, 1995)