AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

BERNARD WISZNIC et al., Respondents, v. NOSTRAND SHOPPERS, INC., Respondent, and TOWN GOWN SHOP, INC., Appellant.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the defendant-respondent.

The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover for personal injuries allegedly sustained when the plaintiff Bernard Wisznic fell into an opening in a clothing store owned by Nostrand Shoppers, Inc. (hereinafter Nostrand Shoppers). The opening, which led to a storage area in the basement, was normally covered by a trap door. There is no evidence that Nostrand Shoppers negligently or defectively constructed, maintained or repaired the premises or that there was any violation of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. There is no evidence that the trap door constituted a defective condition and there is no claim that an unsafe condition existed when the door was in place (see, Brown v Weinreb, 183 A.D.2d 562; Kramer v Ash Clothing, 213 A.D.2d 600). Here, the door became unsafe only after it was left in an open position. Additionally, liability cannot be imposed on Nostrand Shoppers for its failure to provide other safeguards to prevent injury (Brown v Weinreb, supra). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WISZNIC v. NOSTRAND SHOPPERS, INC
(May 15, 1995)