Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.
The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff leave to file a late jury demand. The plaintiff failed to make an adequate factual showing that the specific designation of a nonjury trial on her note of issue was the result of inadvertence or other excusable conduct and that she did not intend to waive her right to a jury trial (see, Tarantino v City of New York, 148 A.D.2d 601; Joseph v Exxon Corp., 83 A.D.2d 549; Brigando v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 A.D.2d 865). Balletta, J.P., Copertino, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.