Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner the cause was argued by David J. Gilles, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs were James D. Jeffries, assistant attorney general, David J. Gilles, assistant attorney general and James E. Doyle, attorney general. For the defendants-respondents there was a combined brief by John R. Dawson and Foley Lardner, Milwaukee; Daniel W. Hildebrand, Dennis P. Birke and Ross Stevens, S.C., Madison and Ronald J. Greene, Marc R. Cohen and Wilmer, Cutler Pickering of Washington, D.C. and oral argument by Daniel W. Hildebrand. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Curtis A. Witynski, Legal Counsel, Madison for the League of Wisconsin Municipalities. Amicus curiae brief was filed by D.J. Weis and Habush, Habush, Davis Rottier, S.C., Rhinelander for the Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • For the plaintiff-appellant-petitioner the cause was argued by David J. Gilles, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs were James D. Jeffries, assistant attorney general, David J. Gilles, assistant attorney general and James E. Doyle, attorney general. For the defendants-respondents there was a combined brief by John R. Dawson and Foley Lardner, Milwaukee; Daniel W. Hildebrand, Dennis P. Birke and Ross Stevens, S.C., Madison and Ronald J. Greene, Marc R. Cohen and Wilmer, Cutler Pickering of Washington, D.C. and oral argument by Daniel W. Hildebrand. Amicus curiae brief was filed by Curtis A. Witynski, Legal Counsel, Madison for the League of Wisconsin Municipalities. Amicus curiae brief was filed by D.J. Weis and Habush, Habush, Davis Rottier, S.C., Rhinelander for the Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. AMERITECH CORPORATION, Household Bank, N.A. and Household Credit Ser

(Affirming 185 Wis.2d 686, 517 N.W.2d 705 (Ct.App. 1994).)

PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether to affirm or reverse the decision of the court of appeals. Justice STEINMETZ, Justice WILCOX, and Justice GESKE would affirm; Chief Justice HEFFERNAN, Justice DAY, and Justice BABLITCH would reverse. Justice Abrahamson did not participate.

Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

STATE v. AMERITECH CORP
(Jun 1, 1995)