AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of WILLIAM GANCI, Appellant, v. JEAN TUTHILL et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The gravamen of the instant proceeding is the alleged wrongful retention of money after the disposition of a criminal action in the course of which money was seized. As such, a timely notice of claim was required to be filed (see, Boyle v. Kelley, 42 N.Y.2d 88; Matter of Oakley v. Police Prop. Clerk of Nassau County, 75 A.D.2d 816; Matter of Abramowitz v. Guido, 61 A.D.2d 1045; County Law § 52; General Municipal Law § 50-e). Since no such notice of claim was filed, the proceeding was properly dismissed (see, Boyle v. Kelley, supra; Matter of Oakley v. Police Prop. Clerk of Nassau County, supra; Matter of Abramowitz v Guido, supra). Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF GANCI v. TUTHILL
(Jun 12, 1995)