Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Car v. ne LANGHAM, John Forister, and John Chapman

On Return to Remand

McMILLAN, Judge.

This cause was remanded to the trial court on May 6, 1994, 662 So.2d 1201, with instructions that it conduct an evidentiary hearing on the disposition of the original indictments of two of the appellants, Carvine Langham and John Forister, to address their argument that the action against them was barred because it was not begun within three years of the commission of the offense.

In compliance with our instruction, an evidentiary hearing was held, at which the prosecutor testified that the original indictments, which were returned on August 28, 1992, were quashed on November 17, 1992, and that on the same day the appellants were reindicted. Therefore, because the appellants were reindicted on the same day that their original indictments were quashed, there was no period of time when an indictment was not pending against them. The prosecution on the aforementioned cases was not barred.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LANGHAM v. STATE
(Jun 16, 1995)