Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Under New York law, the value at which real property may be taxed has been equated with market value, which is "`the amount which one desiring but not compelled to purchase will pay under ordinary conditions to a seller who desires but is not compelled to sell'" (Grant Co. v. Srogi, 52 N.Y.2d 496, 510). The petitioner's parcel had been designated by the Environmental Protection Agency as a "Superfund" cleanup site under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (hereinafter CERCLA) ( 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.). Contrary to the appellants' contentions, the Supreme Court properly determined the market value of the property by deducting the full outstanding cost of the petitioner's compliance with CERCLA from the total assessment for each of the tax years under review (see, Matter of Bass v. Tax Commn., 179 A.D.2d 387; Matter of Northville Indus. Corp. v. Board of Assessors, 143 A.D.2d 135).
We note that the appellants' assertions concerning the petitioner's expert's treatment of the sewer tax for purposes of valuation are not properly before this Court, having been raised for the first time in the appellants' reply brief (see, DeMeo v New York City Tr. Auth., 174 A.D.2d 596). Sullivan, J.P. Miller, Thompson and Joy, JJ., concur.