AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of LEO MULERO, Appellant, v. THOMAS A. COUGHLIN III et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We reject the petitioner's contention that he was deprived of his right to due process by his assistant's failure to interview certain witnesses and to obtain certain documentary evidence in preparation for the petitioner's superintendent's hearing, since the record demonstrates that he suffered no prejudice as a result of these failures (see, Matter of Raqiyb v. Bartlett, 186 A.D.2d 327; Matter of Dixon v. Coughlin, 178 A.D.2d 984; Matter of Curry v. Coughlin, 175 A.D.2d 970; Matter of Irby v. Kelly, 161 A.D.2d 860).

Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Santucci, Altman and Hart, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MULERO v. COUGHLIN III
(Jun 26, 1995)