Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We reject the defendant's contention that reversal is warranted because the People failed to provide him with notice pursuant to Penal Law § 450.10 that the stolen property in question would be returned to the complainant prior to trial, since the record demonstrates that the defendant suffered no prejudice as a result thereof (see, Penal Law § 450.10; People v. Kelly, 62 N.Y.2d 516; People v. McDonald, 199 A.D.2d 539; People v. Dent, 183 A.D.2d 723; People v. Nieves, 133 A.D.2d 234).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either improperly raised on appeal or without merit. Sullivan, J.P., O'Brien, Altman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.