Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RAYMOND E. SHUDA, JR., APPELLANT, v. MARGARET D. SHUDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the contempt order herein except for the portion imposing incarceration which we reverse. On remand, the trial court has three options: (1) criminal contempt proceedings as recommended by the general master; (2) further proceedings for civil contempt to show proof of present ability to pay the purge amount; and (3) a nonincarcerative remedy such as those outlined in Bowen v. Bowen, 471 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 1985). We urge the trial court on remand to make part of the record the prior history of proceedings involving these parties, because this court has been limited in its review by the lack of a complete record of what has transpired heretofore.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and WARNER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHUDA v. SHUDA
(Jul 5, 1995)