Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGE Q. MEDLIN, APPELLANT, v. RUTH V. MEDLIN, APPELLEE.

FARMER, Judge.

The trial court's final judgment awarded the wife $300,000 as lump sum alimony without indicating whether it is in the nature of an equitable distribution or support. At the same time, the judgment contains no listing of marital assets, assigns no values to them, and does not attempt to set up any scheme of distribution. Moreover, although the judgment considers some of the section 61.08(2), Florida Statutes (1993), factors for an alimony award, it fails to consider "the financial resources of each party, the nonmarital and the marital assets and liabilities distributed to each."

We thus follow Walsh v. Walsh, 600 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), and remand with instructions to comply with section 61.08(1).

REVERSED.

GUNTHER, J., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MEDLIN v. MEDLIN
(Jul 12, 1995)