Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record supports the County Court's determination that there was a "definite, pronounced break" ( People v. Chapple, 38 N.Y.2d 112, 115), between the custodial interrogation by the police of the defendant which was improperly conducted without Miranda warnings, and that which was subsequently conducted at police headquarters and properly preceded by Miranda warnings. Accordingly, the County Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress the defendant's statements at police headquarters.
We have examined the defendant's remaining argument and find it to be without merit ( see, People v. Jones, 47 N.Y.2d 528; People v. Rhodes, 107 A.D.2d 769). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.