Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The sole contention raised by the plaintiff is that the court committed reversible error by allowing hearsay testimony by one of the defendants' witnesses. This issue is, in part, unpreserved for review. In any event, any error in the admission of hearsay testimony was harmless as we are satisfied that the result would have been the same if the evidence had not been improperly admitted (see, CPLR 2002; Willinger v. City of New Rochelle, 212 A.D.2d 526; Grawer Bear Constr. Corp. v. Bellino Constr. Co., 195 A.D.2d 499). Sullivan, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson and Santucci, JJ., concur.