Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the court committed reversible error by neglecting to read back the entire testimony of a witness at the jury's request (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818). In any event, the court responded meaningfully to the jury's request (see, People v. Malloy, 55 N.Y.2d 296, 302, cert denied 459 U.S. 847; People v. Almodovar, 62 N.Y.2d 126; CPL 310.30). Moreover, the defendant has failed to demonstrate any serious prejudice resulting from the court's permitting the jury to indicate the point at which the jury had heard enough of the requested testimony (see, People v. Lourido, 70 N.Y.2d 428, 435; People v. Razack, 196 A.D.2d 897).
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit. Miller, J.P., Altman, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.