AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of FELIX ROSADO, Appellant, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, and FREDDIE ARAN, Respondent.

There are 29 signatures involved, voters who have moved within the same part of the Assembly District involved (namely the 68th Assembly District, Part C). There is no question that the Board of Elections was never notified of the address change and further there is no question that the voter registration was ever canceled by the Board of Elections. We disagree with Special Term's invalidation of these 29 signatures. ( Matter of Amer v Previte, 51 A.D.2d 949.) There can be no cancellation until the Board of Elections notifies the voter of its intention to cancel and gives the voter an opportunity to be heard on the matter. ( Nesci v. Canary, 112 A.D.2d 1056.) In view of the fact that there was a never a cancellation by the Board of Elections and the signatories still reside within the same Part of the Assembly District, the signatures must be counted as valid.

Concur — Rubin, J.P., Kupferman, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ROSADO v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS
(Aug 23, 1995)