Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, Debtors. CHO HUNG BANK, a Korean corporation, Appellee, v. Jong Gil KIM; Jung W. Kim, aka Jung Wha Kim aka Jung W. Cho Kim dba Gill Company, Appellants.

ORDER

The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel held that fraudulently inducing a creditor's extension of the due date for repayment of a loan was sufficient under 11 U.S.C. § 523 (a)(2) to support a claim of nondischargeability against a debtor in bankruptcy, and it was not necessary for the creditor to show that "new money" was lent to the debtor. We agree. The opinion of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in In re Kim, 163 B.R. 157 (9th Cir. BAP 1994) is hereby adopted as the opinion of this Court.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE KIM
(Aug 23, 1995)