AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. INFINITE ALLAH, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that reversible error occurred as a result of certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818). In any event, the prosecutor's comments were either fair response to the defense counsel's summation (see, People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396; People v. Russo, 201 A.D.2d 512, affd 85 N.Y.2d 872), or harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt and the court's subsequent instructions which served to cure any alleged prejudice (see, People v. Cunningham, 175 A.D.2d 173; People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230). Rosenblatt, J.P., Altman, Hart and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ALLAH
(Aug 28, 1995)