AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

GREAT NECK OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY, P.C., Appellant-Respondent, v. ELEANOR T. BELLUCCI, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent-Appellant. TERRY RIFKIN, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

When, as here, findings of fact rest in a large measure on the credibility of the witnesses, the decision of the trial court should not be disturbed on appeal unless its conclusions could not have been reached under any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl., 80 N.Y.2d 490, 495).

We agree with the Supreme Court that the defendant, Eleanor T. Bellucci, did not know that the third-party defendant, Terry Rifkin, had abandoned his original plan to compensate her on a percentage basis until February 25, 1990. As a result, the defendant could not have assented to the changed terms until that time.

We have considered the parties' remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ, concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GREAT NECK OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY v. BELLUCCI
(Aug 28, 1995)