Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that the newly discovered evidence, either separately or cumulatively, was of such a nature that, if introduced at trial, probably would have resulted in a different verdict (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [2]; Bertan v Richmond Mem. Hosp. Health Ctr., 131 A.D.2d 799). Therefore, their motion was properly denied. Copertino, J.P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.