AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of the Estate of AARON DIAMOND, Deceased. DORNBUSH MENSCH MANDELSTAM SCHAEFFER et al., Appellants; AARON DIAMOND FOUNDATION, INC. (ULTIMATE CHARITABLE BENEFICIARY), Respondent.

Ordered that the appeals from the decisions are dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 509); and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal of Patterson, Belknap, Webb Tyler is dismissed, for failure to perfect the same in accordance with the rules of this Court (see, 22 NYCRR 670.8 [c], [e]); and it is further,

Ordered that the decree is affirmed insofar as appealed from and reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

It is by now well-settled that the Surrogate bears the ultimate responsibility to decide what constitutes reasonable legal compensation (see, Matter of Mergentime, 207 A.D.2d 452; Matter of Verplanck, 151 A.D.2d 767, 768; see also, Matter of Smolley, 188 A.D.2d 535). Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the Surrogate's Court properly exercised its discretion in not awarding disbursements and expenses (see, Matter of Zalaznick, NYLJ, Nov. 19, 1976, at 11, col 1, affd 61 A.D.2d 772).

We have examined the remaining contention of the appellant Dornbush, Mensch, Mandelstam Schaeffer and find it to be without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Thompson, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DIAMOND
(Sep 25, 1995)