AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. YONG HO HAN, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon remittitur from this Court, the County Court, Nassau County, conducted a hearing to determine whether the defendant should be required to make restitution and to determine the proper amount of restitution (see, People v. Yong Ho Han, 200 A.D.2d 780). At this hearing, the defendant consented to pay $83,694.13 in restitution to reimburse the deceased victim's father for funeral expenses and the Crime Victims Board for the injured victim's medical expenses. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the court did not err by ordering restitution to the deceased victim's father and the Crime Victims Board since restitution can be ordered to be paid to third parties who have reimbursed the victims for their loss (see, People v. Cruz, 81 N.Y.2d 996; People v. Hall-Wilson, 69 N.Y.2d 154; People v. Canada, 156 A.D.2d 1001; People v. Bowden, 131 A.D.2d 581; People v. Chery, 126 A.D.2d 659).

We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HO HAN
(Oct 16, 1995)