AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. STUART HEWITT, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

At the trial pursuant to Indictment No. 5154/92, it was error to have permitted the People to present expert testimony that the illegal drugs possessed by the defendant were intended for sale (see, People v. Goodwine, 177 A.D.2d 708). However, based on the testimony concerning the quantity (56 vials), value, and distinctive packaging of the cocaine, and the otherwise overwhelming proof of guilt, we find the error to be harmless (see, People v. Goodwine, supra; People v. Nelson, 189 A.D.2d 828; People v. Herndon, 176 A.D.2d 817).

The defendant's remaining contentions are either academic, unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10). Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HEWITT
(Oct 23, 1995)