Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The economic issues implicated in the present matter were initially resolved after a trial and have been examined on appeal (see, Mattwell v. Mattwell, 194 A.D.2d 715). The husband has failed to demonstrate his right to a second trial based on his alleged discovery of new evidence (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [2]). The husband has failed to show that the evidence upon which his motion was based "could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence, that it [was] likely to produce a different result, [or] that it [was] in the interests of substantial justice to grant the motion" (Cizler v. Cizler, 19 A.D.2d 819, 819-820). Bracken, J.P., Rosenblatt, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.