Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Furthermore, there is no showing that the defendant is entitled to a new trial as a result of the prosecutor's alleged failure to disclose the record of conviction of one of the People's witnesses (see, CPL 240.45 [b]). The defense counsel was made aware of the prior conviction and used it for impeachment on cross-examination (see, People v Fuentes, 199 A.D.2d 980; see also, People v Clark, 194 A.D.2d 868, 869).
The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.