Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Mary B. Hendrix, Respondent v. Eastern Distribution, Inc., Petitioner.

Per Curiam:

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals' opinion in Hendrix v. Eastern Distribution. Inc., 316 S.C. 34, 446 S.E.2d 440 (Ct.App. 1994). We affirm in result.

Hendrix instituted a breach of contract action against her former employer, Eastern Distribution, Inc. The jury returned a verdict for Hendrix. Eastern appealed, claiming the trial court should have granted its motion for a directed verdict. The Court of Appeals found this issue procedurally barred from review and, accordingly, affirmed the judgment in Hendrix' favor. The Court of Appeals nonetheless went on to address the merits of the issue.

Since the issue concerning Eastern's motion for a directed verdict was not preserved for review, it should not have been addressed. Smith v. Phillips, 318 S.C. 453, 458 S.E.2d 427 (1995) (Davis Adv. Sh. No. 13 at 18); Connolly v. People's Life Insurance Co., 299 S.C. 348, 384 S.E.2d 738 (1989). Accordingly, we affirm in result only. We vacate the Court of Appeals' opinion to the extent it addressed an issue which was not preserved.

Affirmed in result.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HENDRIX v. EASTERN DISTRIBUTION
(Nov 6, 1995)