AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

DAVID R. WALLACE et al., Indi v. dually and as Administrators of the Estate of JONATHAN A. WALLACE, Deceased, Respondents,

Yesawich Jr., J.

Decedent, Jonathan A. Wallace, three years of age, was fatally injured when struck by defendants' automobile. When the accident occurred the infant was chasing a ball into the cul-de-sac by his home. Plaintiffs, decedent's parents, who were in the immediate vicinity at the time of the accident, commenced this action for their son's wrongful death and for the pain and suffering endured by plaintiff Laurie J. Wallace, decedent's mother, who assertedly was in the zone of danger. Defendants moved to amend their answer to add a counterclaim charging that plaintiffs' negligence was the primary cause of the accident; their claimed negligence is that they did not keep decedent from playing in the street. Defendants appeal the denial of their motion. We affirm.

The gravamen of the counterclaim is negligent parental supervision of a child, which is not actionable ( see, Holodook v Spencer, 36 N.Y.2d 35, 48; Hlavinka v Slovak Sky Bungalow Colony, 203 A.D.2d 855). Defendants' contrary view notwithstanding, a breach of no duty, apart from that stemming from the family relationship, has been alleged ( see, Barocas v Woolworth Co., 207 A.D.2d 145; Walden v Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst., 116 A.D.2d 963).

Cardona, P.J., White, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WALLACE v. PACELLI
(Nov 16, 1995)